Sinclair, Gordon and Sinclair, Yolanda (2025) Identification repentance in New Covenant theology: a balanced theological and pastoral appraisal. Journal of Pastoral and Practical Theology, 04 (01). pp. 58-69. ISSN 2957-6482
This article assesses Identification Repentance (IR) within New Covenant theology. Identification Repentance (IR) refers to repenting for the sins of a group with which one identifies. It has gained popularity in intercessory contexts. However, its theological validity within New Covenant theology is questionable. While Old Testament figures like Nehemiah and Daniel model communal confession, these acts lack the personal transformation central to New Testament repentance. This study uses a doctrinal definition (Webster, 2005), biblical-theological analysis (Vos, 2003), thematic evaluation (Grenz & Olson, 1996), and a balanced appraisal (Grenz & Olson, 1996) to assess IR’s theological coherence. Scripture is allowed to shape doctrine, tracing IR across redemptive history and evaluating its compatibility in the New Covenant context. IR lacks biblical, patristic, and liturgical support. Key texts (e.g., Nehemiah 1; Daniel 9) demonstrate Identification Confession (IC), but not repentance. The New Covenant emphasises personal accountability, emotional integrity, and spiritual rebirth. IR risks undermining the believer’s new identity in Christ and runs the risk of confusing intercession with repentance. IR should not be normative in the Church. Ministers should promote authentic, Spirit-led repentance, distinguish IR from IC, and emphasise the believer’s identity in Christ. Lament and intercession are valid expressions of pastoral solidarity, but must not replace personal repentance.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
Download (384kB) | Preview
![]() |
View Item |