Comparisons of machine learning techniques for detecting malicious webpages

Kazemian, Hassan and Ahmed, Shafi (2014) Comparisons of machine learning techniques for detecting malicious webpages. Expert Systems with Applications, 42 (3). pp. 1166-1177. ISSN 0957-4174

Preview

Text Expert Systems with Applications.pdf - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract / Description

This paper compares machine learning techniques for detecting malicious webpages. The conventional method of detecting malicious webpages is going through the black list and checking whether the webpages are listed. Black list is a list of webpages which are classified as malicious from a user’s point of view. These black lists are created by trusted organizations and volunteers. They are then used by modern web browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, etc. However, black list is ineffective because of the frequent-changing nature of webpages, growing numbers of webpages that pose scalability issues and the crawlers’ inability to visit intranet webpages that require computer operators to log in as authenticated users. In this paper therefore alternative and novel approaches are used by applying machine learning algorithms to detect malicious webpages. In this paper three supervised machine learning techniques such as K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine and Naive Bayes Classifier, and two unsupervised machine learning techniques such as K-Means and Affinity Propagation are employed. Please note that K-Means and Affinity Propagation have not been applied to detection of malicious webpages by other researchers. All these machine learning techniques have been used to build predictive models to analyze large number of malicious and safe webpages. These webpages were downloaded by a concurrent crawler taking advantage of gevent. The webpages were parsed and various features such as content, URL and screenshot of webpages were extracted to feed into the machine learning models. Computer simulation results have produced an accuracy of up to 98% for the supervised techniques and silhouette coefficient of close to 0.96 for the unsupervised techniques. These predictive models have been applied in a practical context whereby Google Chrome can harness the predictive capabilities of the classifiers that have the advantages of both the lightweight and the heavyweight classifiers.

Item Type:	Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:	K-Nearest Neighbor; Support Vector Machine; Naive Bayes; Affinity Propagation; K-Means; Supervised and unsupervised learning
Subjects:	000 Computer science, information & general works > 020 Library & information sciences
Department:	School of Computing and Digital Media
Depositing User:	Hassan Kazemian
Date Deposited:	21 Sep 2015 09:56
Last Modified:	21 Apr 2020 10:51
URI:	https://repository.londonmet.ac.uk/id/eprint/754

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item